Does Rep. Jerry Nadler, D-N.Y., really live in New York or an alternate universe?
People certainly wondered after a House Judiciary Committee hearing where the 76-year-old declared, “Men do not compete in women’s sports.” Is the president’s senility contagious or is Nadler living in complete denial of a global phenomenon that’s plunged communities into chaos?
Not only are men competing in women’s sports, they’re winning women’s titles—a fact Riley Gaines was more than happy to point out.
“Ironic he says this on the EXACT two-year anniversary of this photo being taken,” Gaines, the former University of Kentucky swimmer, posted alongside a picture of Lia Thomas holding a trophy he never should have had the chance to race for. “This 6’4” man isn’t fooling anyone with any amount of common sense,” Gaines fumed. “2 years ago today, I had a fire lit under me and communists like Nadler continue to fuel it.”
And yet, Nadler was so determined to suppress reality that he actually moved to have evidence of the debate stricken from the record. Rep. Harriet Hageman, R-Wyo., had catalogued a number of times that biological boys had stolen girls’ titles and opportunities in the past several years.
The group SheWon puts the number at an eye-popping 292 stolen first-place podiums. “I ask for unanimous consent to submit for the record instances of men hijacking women’s sports and the various examples that we have demonstrating not only injuries that have been suffered by women as men have participated in girls sports, but also the women—the girls and women who have been affected by this, including Riley Gaines, when Will Thomas decided to join the … women’s swimming team in Pennsylvania,” Hageman requested.
Nadler, the committee’s ranking member, fired back, “I object to concluding these mistruths in the record.” Shocked, Hageman replied how telling it was that he didn’t want the facts included in the record—to which the New Yorker replied, “Men do not compete in women’s sports.”
That’s news to the 25 (going on 26) states that have stepped in to stop this madness from overtaking their girls at the pool, track, court, field, and gym. If it wasn’t happening, then this was sure a monumental waste of legislative time.
Slack-jawed, conservatives kept up the pressure, giving a passionate defense of girls and the opportunities, safety, and privacy they’re losing by this absurd introduction of men in women’s sports.
Rep. Victoria Spartz, R-Ind., showed a video montage of girls who’ve been physically injured playing against biological boys in volleyball, field hockey, and basketball. From Massachusetts to North Carolina, members watched as girls screamed in pain, lost teeth, were carted off with head injuries. One of the victims, Payton McNabb, still suffers from blurred vision, partial paralysis, and memory loss.
We have examples, Spartz insisted, of “much stronger guys playing sports against biologically not-as-strong women.”
“Girls actually get hurt by biological males playing sports,” she argued. “I mean, it is really unbelievable for me that this is an issue that we cannot stand with women and girls on.” Instead, Spartz went on, “the other side tries to really deter the conversation in a different direction and divert it. … Let’s talk about how we are going to protect our women and girls.”
When the talk turned to privacy rights, Rep. Eric Swalwell, D-Calif., joined Nadler’s delusion, claiming that men in girls locker rooms “is not a thing.”
Tell that to the 16 plaintiffs suing the NCAA. One of them, Gaines’ teammate and Southeastern Conference champion Kaitlynn Wheeler, describes in agonizing detail how they were put in a “fundamentally unfair situation that no student-athlete, let alone a teenage girl, should ever have to face.”
The collegiate sports body “did not simply make my teammates in the 100-, 200-, and 500-yard freestyle races face a biological male swimmer in the pool,” she insisted. “The NCAA also decided that Lia Thomas, a 6-foot-4-inch, 22-year-old transgender swimmer with a male body and full male genitalia, would be undressing with us.”
She writes of that traumatizing experience in a new Washington Examiner op-ed:
The moment I realized Thomas would be sharing our most private space, I was engulfed by a whirlwind of emotions—shock, disbelief, horror. The sanctity of our locker room, a space that should have been ours and ours alone, was shattered without warning.
The presence of male genitalia in a space that was supposed to be safe, where we were vulnerable and exposed, was not just uncomfortable. It was a visceral invasion of our privacy and dignity.
Feeling my stomach churn as whispers turned to silence, I stood there, naked and exposed, not just physically, but also emotionally, grappling with a reality I couldn’t comprehend.
The NCAA’s decision to transform our sanctuary into a ‘unisex’ locker room without our consent felt like a betrayal of the highest order. It was a stark reminder that our voices, our comfort, and our boundaries did not matter.
And yet, the effort to protect these girls is what Swalwell called “creepy”—not forcing innocent teenagers to share a room with a naked man. That’s what really stings, the girls say. No one has their backs. As so many female athletes admitted to Senate Republicans, they feel helpless.
“This is kind of a theme that we got,” Sen. Bill Cassidy, R-La., said of his committee’s investigation on trans inclusion in sports: “‘Why am I even trying? I don’t have any hope whatsoever.’”
“Our voices as women were completely silenced,” another admitted.
Fortunately for Wheeler and the thousands of American daughters living this nightmare, Republicans do care. Over the objections of Democrats, conservatives on the House Judiciary Committee passed the Protection of Women in Olympic and Amateur Sports Act—authored by Rep. Greg Steube, R-Fla.—on March 21.
To Wheeler, who watched Thomas stand on top of a podium meant for her sport, maybe it will mean the end of the silence of the adults in the room. “That silence spoke volumes of the injustice, pain, and anger brewing in the hearts of not just the competitors, but of every woman forced into silence by a system that refuses to listen.”
Until then, she vowed, women will “stand against the erasure of our voices,” whether or not this president or his party stands with them. “We demand a future where female athletes are respected, where our safety and privacy are not just acknowledged, but fiercely protected.”
Originally published by The Washington Stand
The Daily Signal publishes a variety of perspectives. Nothing written here is to be construed as representing the views of The Heritage Foundation.
