Site icon The Daily Signal

No, Liberals, the Second Amendment Still Isn’t About Hunting

The Second Amendment isn’t primarily about hunting. It's centered on the unalienable right of self-defense, as these 11 incidents last month show. (Photo illustration: Glasshouse Images/Getty Images)

Vice President Kamala Harris just announced her selection of Minnesota Gov. Tim Walz as her running mate in the Nov. 5 presidential election.

As governor, Walz routinely touts his gun ownership and affinity for duck hunting as a reason why people should take his opinions in favor of more gun control seriously.

He completely misses the point.

The Second Amendment isn’t primarily about hunting, and the constitutional right to keep and bear arms isn’t premised on ensuring the ability to shoot ducks for food or sport.

It is, rather, centered on the unalienable right of self-defense. And it’s fundamentally concerned with securing the rights and liberties of a free people living in a free state.

As it turns out, that fundamental concern is just as important to the safety and security of ordinary Americans today as it was in 1791, when the Second Amendment was ratified.

Almost every major study has found that Americans use their firearms in self-defense between 500,000 and 3 million times annually, according to a 2013 report by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. In 2021, the most comprehensive study ever conducted on the issue concluded that roughly 1.6 million defensive gun uses occur in the United States every year.

For this reason, The Daily Signal publishes a monthly article highlighting some of the previous month’s many news stories on defensive gun use that you may have missed—or that might not have made it to the national spotlight in the first place. (Read other accounts from past years here.)

The examples below represent only a small portion of the news stories on defensive gun use during crimes that we found in July. You may explore more using The Heritage Foundation’s interactive Defensive Gun Use Database

As these examples so clearly demonstrate, the core purpose of the right to keep and bear arms isn’t to put food on the table but to give ordinary Americans the practical ability to defend themselves so that they make it home for dinner.

It’s a shame that we keep having to remind certain anti-gun politicians that we’re not particularly worried about “deer in Kevlar vests.”

No, we’re worried—just as the nation’s founding generation was—about armed criminals who wear masks and tyrants who enforce at bayonet point the egregious laws they dictated through pen strokes.

And a politician’s affinity for hunting doesn’t make his support for restrictive gun control measures any less of an affront to the purpose of the Second Amendment.

Exit mobile version