We are in a looming financial crisis, even if we don’t want to see it.
Silicon Valley Bank was, according to Moody’s, worthy of an investment-grade rating as of March 8. S&P Global Ratings similarly held a high opinion of SVB. Two days later, SVB was shut down. Immediately, Moody’s dropped SVB into junk territory. So did S&P Global Ratings.
Within days, Signature Bank—with former Rep. Barney Frank, D-Mass., co-sponsor of the famed and much-ballyhooed Dodd-Frank Act, on the board—went belly up.
The Biden administration, touting its own heroism, immediately stepped in to fill the gap. Concerned that unsecured depositors would lose billions in cash, Team Biden announced that all unsecured depositors would get their money back. The Federal Reserve launched a Bank Term Funding Program to create additional reserves for the banks.
Then President Joe Biden himself claimed that he had stabilized the banking system.
He hasn’t.
To understand just why throwing money at the problem with the banks won’t solve the underlying issue, we need to understand just why SVB failed in the first place.
It failed thanks to three specific factors: from 2020 to 2022, the federal government injected more liquidity into the American economy than at any time in history, bar none; SVB, trusting that the liquidity would keep on coming, socked away a large amount of that liquidity into bonds, which bore a low interest rate; the federal government, having now created an inflationary wildfire, had to count on the Federal Reserve to cut inflation by raising interest rates. Those increased interest rates made SVB’s bond holdings lower; when depositors, hampered by the lack of easy money, started to withdraw their cash, SVB had to liquidate the bonds at a loss, essentially bankrupting them.
So, what happened? Simply put, the federal government created a carousel of easy cash; investors thought the carousel would never stop; it stopped. Now, the federal government blames capitalism—and in the process, claims that by injecting more liquidity into the system, it will prevent capitalism from melting down the banks.
But instead, the federal government has created two new problems: First, the Federal Reserve has now given itself the unenviable task of simultaneously quashing inflation (which requires raising interest rates) and shoring up the banks (which requires lowering them and/or injecting more liquidity). Second, the federal government has created a new and massive moral hazard, whereby bank managers know that if they promise outsized returns to their depositors, they can gain their business—and worst-case scenario, the government will bail out the depositors anyway.
Now the experts tell us that the Biden team will achieve a soft landing, that it’ll somehow square the circle, lowering inflation while preventing bank assets from depreciating, incentivizing financial responsibility while simultaneously backstopping bad decision-making, and promoting fiscal responsibility while proposing $7 trillion budgets.
No one has this kind of power, least of all the team that’s brought America four-decade-high inflation, the highest interest rates since before the 2007-2008 financial crash, and an ever-soaring national debt.
No, the crisis will arrive. If it feels like the federal government can fly, that’s just because it always feels that way when you jump out of a 10th-story window and you’re nine stories down.
Biden and the economy are not immune to the forces of financial gravity.
COPYRIGHT 2023 CREATORS.COM
The Daily Signal publishes a variety of perspectives. Nothing written here is to be construed as representing the views of The Heritage Foundation.
Have an opinion about this article? To sound off, please email letters@DailySignal.com and we’ll consider publishing your edited remarks in our regular “We Hear You” feature. Remember to include the url or headline of the article plus your name and town and/or state.