Site icon The Daily Signal

Federal Appeals Court Sides With Harvard in Race Discrimination Lawsuit

A woman cheers at a rally in Boston's Copley Square on Oct, 14, 2018, in support of Students for Fair Admissions' lawsuit against Harvard University alleging anti-Asian discrimination in admissions. (Photo: Jessica Rinaldi/The Boston Globe/Getty Images)

A federal appeals court ruled Thursday that Harvard University’s admissions process did not violate the civil rights of Asian Americans, Reuters reported.

The decision, which comes after the 1st U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals heard arguments less than two months ago, upholds a decision from District Court Judge Allison D. Burroughs that favored Harvard after the case was heard in October 2018, the news agency reported.

The appeals court decided that the plaintiffs, Students for Fair Admissions, had standing for the lawsuit but affirmed Harvard’s admission processes, The Harvard Crimson reported

Harvard spokeswoman Rachael Dane applauded the decision in an email to students.

“Today’s decision once again finds that Harvard’s admissions policies are consistent with Supreme Court precedent, and lawfully and appropriately pursue Harvard’s efforts to create a diverse campus that promotes learning and encourages mutual respect and understanding in our community,” Dane wrote, The Harvard Crimson reported.

“As we have said time and time again, now is not the time to turn back the clock on diversity and opportunity,” Dane added.

Students for Fair Admissions first sued Harvard in 2014, alleging that the university discriminated against Asian Americans in admissions processes, Reuters reported. Harvard denied the allegations and said it legally promotes diversity.

Burroughs had ruled that although Harvard’s admissions system wasn’t perfect, there weren’t any “‘workable and available race-neutral alternatives’” to guarantee a diverse student body. Circuit Judge Sandra Lynch cited Supreme Court cases that said universities can consider race.

In Thursday’s ruling, Lynch and Chief Judge Jeffrey R. Howard said that Burroughs had determined essential components correctly, The Harvard Crimson reported, including that Harvard had considered race-neutral alternatives and didn’t engage in racial balancing.

“While we are disappointed with the opinion of the 1st Circuit Court of Appeals, our hope is not lost,” Edward Blum, president of Students for Fair Admissions, said in a statement provided to The Daily Caller News Foundation.

“This lawsuit is now on track to go up to the U.S. Supreme Court, where we will ask the justices to end these unfair and unconstitutional race-based admissions policies at Harvard and all colleges and universities,” Blum said.

Harvard University did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

Content created by The Daily Caller News Foundation is available without charge to any eligible news publisher that can provide a large audience. For licensing opportunities for this original content, email licensing@dailycallernewsfoundation.org.

Exit mobile version