Site icon The Daily Signal

What 2016 Hopefuls Say About the Court Ruling Against Obama’s Immigration Moves

  • Ken McIntyre

    • Two Texans -- Sen. Ted Cruz and former Gov. Rick Perry -- are among presidential hopefuls hailing the judge's decision. (Photo: Bob Daemmrich/Polaris)

    Would-be successors to President Obama wasted little time aligning themselves with a federal judge who blocked the president from unilaterally allowing up to 5 million illegal immigrants to stay here and get work permits.

    Although neither Hillary Rodham Clinton nor any other Democratic hopeful was out front with a reaction, some of the likeliest Republican candidates warmly greeted U.S. District Judge Andrew Hanen’s temporary restraining order in favor of Texas and 25 other states. Hanen’s ruling stops government officials from moving ahead with Obama’s executive actions.

    The formal responses from White House hopefuls, some in reply to The Daily Signal’s request for comment, indicate an awareness that once more the race for president can’t avoid the issue of how or whether to legalize the status of some 11 million illegal immigrants.

    “The president’s action was a blatant overreach of executive power, an affront to the rule of law, and put partisan politics in front of lasting solutions,” former Texas Gov. Rick Perry said in a statement sent to The Daily Signal yesterday afternoon.  “He put the legal status of millions of immigrants in question, adding confusion –not clarity — for these individuals.”

    The 26 states challenged Obama’s executive actions to remove the threat of deportation without an act of Congress. Hanen’s order prevents the president from making the disputed changes to the immigration system — what many critics call executive amnesty — until the facts of the states’ legal challenge can be heard.

    >>> Q&A: What You Need to Know About The Court Order Stopping Obama on Immigration

    Another Texas Republican, Sen. Ted Cruz, was among the first White House hopefuls to comment, following up today with an online discussion set for 5 p.m. EST:

    Cruz called the decision late Monday “a major turning point in the fight to stop Obama’s lawless amnesty,” and singled out Perry’s successor, Texas Gov. Greg Abbott, as well as Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton for praise.

    “This is a major victory for the rule of law. The District Court’s ruling states that President Obama must now stop implementing these policies in ‘any and all aspects,’” said Cruz, a lawyer who for five years argued the state’s positions as the solicitor general appointed by Abbott when he was attorney general.

    Louisiana Gov. Bobby Jindal, one of the sitting governors pondering entering the Republican race, praised the judge’s decision:

    Louisiana joined this lawsuit because what the president is doing to grant amnesty to millions of illegal aliens is unconstitutional, and we’re glad the court agreed. On his own volition, President Obama ignored the law and the will of the American people. President Obama did this on his own because he knows the American people reject the idea and he couldn’t pass it in Congress. Fortunately, the rule of law is something President Obama cannot sidestep. Now it’s time for Congress to once and for all secure the border.

    >>> Commentary: Democrats Choose Illegal Immigrants Over Border Patrol Agents

    “President Obama did this on his own because he knows the American people reject the idea and he couldn’t pass it in Congress.” –@BobbyJindal

    Perry, like Jindal, also urged Congress “to act quickly to pass a bill to secure the border once and for all.”

    Also out with a carefully worded response to the judge’s 123-page decision and order was Jeb Bush, the former Florida governor who in the past has embraced a path to citizenship for immigrants here illegally.

    In a post on Facebook, Bush said:

    Post by Jeb Bush.

     

    A spokesman for Sen. Marco Rubio, R-Fla., who co-sponsored the Senate-passed comprehensive immigration reform bill in 2013, said he had anticipated such a decision.

    “Senator Rubio has repeatedly said that the president’s executive actions are unconstitutional, and so we’re not surprised by the judge’s ruling,” spokesman Alex Conant told The Daily Signal. “Fixing our broken immigration system should be done through legislation, starting with border security and internal enforcement.”

    >>> Commentary: Unconstitutional Before It Wasn’t? Democrats in Their Own Words

    Former business executive Carly Fiorina — who has visited first primary state New Hampshire in recent days —  “agrees with” the judge’s reasoning, spokeswoman Sarah Isgur Flores told The Daily Signal.

    “Carly believes this administration has acted unconstitutionally and has been particularly lawless when it comes to expanding their immigration powers while refusing to secure the border,” Flores said.

    Mike Huckabee, the former Arkansas governor and 2008 campaign veteran, said in a statement from Little Rock that Hanen “rightly draws a line in the sand on President Obama’s unconstitutional executive orders.” Huckabee added:

    President Obama has a fundamental lack of understanding of the Constitution and executive authority.  Despite what he thinks, our Constitution doesn’t allow the president to just invent new immigration laws.  This ruling is a battle victory in the war against the president’s unconstitutional overreach.

    Some GOP hopefuls passed up the opportunity to weigh in. A spokesman for retired neurosurgeon Ben Carson, who appears to have significant grassroots support for a race for president, told The Daily Signal that Carson would have no comment at this stage.

    Later, however,  this appeared on Carson’s Twitter account:

    Spokesmen for other Republican presidential hopefuls – among them Walker, Paul, New Jersey Gov. Chris Christie and former Sen. Rick Santorum of Pennsylvania  — did not respond to The Daily Signal’s requests for specific reactions. Paul did tweet on the subject late yesterday and again today, though:

    Like Jindal, Cruz drew a line between the ruling and the current impasse in Congress over funding for the Department of Homeland Security as a result of Obama’s executive actions to change the immigration system – which falls under that agency.

     “Last summer we saw a humanitarian crisis on our southern border that was a direct consequence of Obama’s previous amnesty,” Cruz said, adding:

    Republicans are now standing together to try to ensure that it never happens again. The Senate Democrats who are filibustering Department of Homeland Security funding should look hard at this ruling. At a time when we face grave national security threats, at home and abroad, it is the height of irresponsibility for the Democrats to block this funding in an extreme attempt to save Obama’s amnesty, which a federal judge has just declared illegal.

    This report was updated.

    >>> Commentary: Why a Federal Judge Temporarily Halted Obama’s Amnesty Plan

    No related posts.

    Exit mobile version