Why Are North Korean Defectors Destined for Severe Punishment?
Inkyeong Yun /
China is currently considering repatriating nine young North Korean defectors back to North Korea. In early October, the defectors fled North Korea by crossing the Yalu River to Shenyang and then traveling to the town of Nanning on the Chinese border with Vietnam. They crossed into Vietnam on Oct. 22 but were caught by Vietnamese police and handed over to Chinese authorities in Dongxing, Guangxi. On Oct.26, they were taken to Shenyang by train and may now be repatriated back to North Korea where they will likely face punishment and persecution upon their return.
International organizations are calling upon China to uphold their international obligations as a signatory of the U.N. Refugee Convention and not repatriate the nine defectors. Phil Robertson, deputy director of Human Rights Watch, wrote in a statement, “Beijing should abide by its international obligations and allow the nine refugees to settle in a safe country.” Ravina Shamdasani, a spokeswoman for the U.N. Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights, urged Chinese authorities to disclose where the defectors are and urged Beijing not to repatriate them to North Korea.
China’s decision whether to repatriate defectors has often been contingent on the current health of its relationship with North Korea. Beijing used to repatriate all defectors.
However, after bilateral relations worsened due to North Korea’s third unclear test and the execution of Jang Song-thaek, a former high-ranking North Korean official and liaison to Beijing in 2013, China was reluctant to send North Korean defectors back. Now that bilateral relations are improving, the likelihood of repatriation of the nine defectors is heightened.
As a signatory of the 1951 Convention and its 1967 Protocol relating to the Status of Refugees, which were enforced respectively in April 1954 and in October 1967, China is obligated to uphold the principle of non-refoulement which states that any “contracting state” shall not expel a refugee “in any manner whatsoever to the frontiers of territories where his or his life or freedom would be threatened,”
However, China has allowed an agreement with North Korea, titled the “Protocol between the PRC Ministry of Public Security and the DPRK Social Safety Ministry for Mutual Cooperation in Safeguarding National Security and Social Order in Border Areas” signed in July 1964 to supersede its international obligations.
The United Nations Commission of Inquiry into Human Rights in North Korea confirmed that “despite gross human rights violations awaiting forcibly repatriated persons in the DPRK [Democratic People’s Republic of Korea], China pursues a rigorous policy of forced repatriation of DPRK.” The report found that repatriated North Koreans often face unspeakable persecution upon repatriation, especially defectors that had contact with Christians or South Koreans.
Olivia Enos, a research associate in the Asian Studies Center at The Heritage Foundation, stated:
“Justice Michael Kirby, the lead U.N. investigator for the COI [Commission of Inquiry], said that the persecution of religious minorities, in particular Christians, in one of the least discussed findings of the report. As a global leader on international religious freedom, the U.S. can do more to hold North Korea accountable for its egregious violations of religious liberty.”
The U.S. can and should do more to hold China accountable for repatriating North Korean defectors and should vocally express its opposition to the brutal resending of them certainly facing harsh punishment.